ovr.news

Accountability

Transparency is not an obligation for us. It's a choice. Here we explain the rules we follow and how you can reach us.

For details on AI transparency, credibility scaffolding, and source quality, see why you can trust this.

Sources and copyright

ovr.news collects news from public RSS feeds. We don't copy articles. Our AI creates original summaries in new words. The original remains the publisher's property. We always link to the source.

We respect paywalls and access restrictions. If a source blocks access, we accept that, and articles where we cannot retrieve sufficient content are excluded. On the EU Copyright Directive's text and data mining opt-out (Article 4): when we consider adding a source, we read its robots.txt for AI crawler directives, and a domain that signals one is flagged and set aside rather than onboarded. Two honest limits — it's a signal a person acts on, not an automatic block, and we don't re-scan sources already on the list. So if you've opted out and we're still carrying you, tell us and we'll remove you.

For publishers: See our dedicated publisher information page for details on attribution, data processing, and how to opt out.

The EU AI Act

Since 2 August 2026, Article 50 of the EU AI Act requires that text generated by AI and published to inform the public be identified as such. That applies to us. Every summary and every headline on this site is written by a language model, not by a person.

The law exempts AI text that a human reviews before publication. We don't claim that exemption. Nobody reads each article before it goes live — selection and writing are automated end to end, which is precisely the case the disclosure rule exists for.

So we label it: on the article page, the homepage and lens pages, both RSS feeds, the email and channel digests, and — since August 2026 — the preview card that apps like Slack and WhatsApp generate when someone pastes a link to us. (We mark the fields those cards read; whether a given app chooses to show them is outside our control.) Not a footer link on any of them: a feed reader, an email or a preview card never shows you this page. What is not AI-generated: the images (see below) and the source links, which always point at the original.

We follow the EU's Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content, published in June 2026 and confirmed by the Commission as an adequate way to meet these duties. It deliberately prescribes no single marking technique — no method available today satisfies everything the Act asks of one — so what you see here is our reading of it, not a certification.

The Act also asks that generated text be marked so machines can detect it, not just people. Every article carries a standard tag for that, and so does every item in our feeds.

Article 50's remaining duties don't reach us — we run no chatbot, no emotion recognition, and we generate no synthetic images, audio or video. If you think a summary misrepresents its source, use the report button on the article. That's the correction mechanism, and we read what comes in.

Images

Images on ovr.news come from four sources:

Who owns this, and who pays for it

Knowing who stands behind a news service is part of being able to judge it. The European Media Freedom Act asks media services to publish this, and we would rather publish it than argue about whether we have to.

Editorial independence. Nobody outside this project can influence what appears here, and there is no commercial relationship that could create the pressure — no advertiser to please, no investor with a return to earn, no sponsor whose sector we would then be softer on. What gets published is decided by the lens scores and the editorial rules, which are documented in under the hood rather than left to discretion. Where a rule removes a story, that removal is recorded so it can be reviewed later.

Conflicts of interest. The technical work on ovr.news is done by the operator's own freelance practice — the same person builds it, runs it and owns it. That is the one structural conflict worth naming, and naming it is the mitigation available to a project this size. We hold no stake in any organisation we cover. If a story ever concerned a party we are connected to, we would say so on the article.

Privacy

Data controller: Veen Systems, The Netherlands — see who owns this. For privacy questions, use our contact form.

Short version: We collect as little as possible. We set no cookies on the public site, don't track you, and don't show ads. You are not a product here. (Cloudflare's infrastructure may set technical cookies for DDoS protection, outside our control; our operator-only admin area uses strictly-necessary session cookies.)

What we don't do

What we do

Legal basis

Under GDPR Article 6, we process data on the following legal bases:

Data retention

Your rights

Under GDPR, you have the right to access, correct, or delete any personal data we hold, as well as the right to restrict processing, data portability, and to object. Since we collect almost no data, these rights rarely apply in practice. But they are yours.

To exercise any of these rights, use our contact form or email busara.eu@proton.me. We will respond within 30 days. You may also file a complaint with the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens).

Open source

The scoring filters and training pipeline that power our lenses are public. The site and pipeline code are not yet open source but may be in the future.

LLM Distillery on GitHub →

Contact

For publishers, privacy questions, feedback, or suggestions: use our contact form.

Last updated: August 2026